Trademark Bank, a New York-based financial institution, has been strike with a class-action lawsuit alleging that the financial institution employed in discriminatory lending practices. The lawsuit, filed in December 2022, accuses Trademark Bank of questioning loans to minority-owned companies and companies positioned in mainly minority neighborhoods.
The lawsuit states that Trademark Bank's lending practices violated the Fair Property Act, which prohibits discrimination in property and lending centered on competition, shade, faith, national source, intercourse, familial status, or disability. The lawsuit alleges that Signature Bank favored white borrowers over minority borrowers, and that this discrimination was intentional and led to substantial harm to minority-owned corporations and communities.
The plaintiffs in the lawsuit include a number of minority-owned corporations and advocacy businesses, including the National Community Reinvestment Coalition, the Association for Community and Housing Progress, and the Brooklyn Supportive Federal Credit Union. The plaintiffs are seeking damages for the harm caused by Trademark Bank's so-called discriminatory financing methods, along with an injunction to prevent the bank from engaging in more discrimination.
Signature Bank has rejected the allegations in the lawsuit, stating it is committed to good financing methods and that it does not discriminate on the foundation of battle or any other secured characteristic. The financial institution has additionally mentioned so it will strongly defend itself against the lawsuit.
The class-action lawsuit against Trademark Bank is part of a larger trend of appropriate activity against financial institutions for discriminatory lending practices. In recent years, a number of banks and different financial institutions have been sued for allegedly discriminating against group borrowers, and some lawsuits have resulted in substantial settlements or judgments against the banks
Xero London.
Discriminatory lending practices have a substantial affect minority neighborhoods, limiting their access to credit and economic opportunities. The Fair Property Behave and different anti-discrimination laws are intended to make sure that all borrowers have similar usage of credit, and to prevent the harms due to discriminatory lending practices.
The end result of the class-action lawsuit against Signature Bank remains to be seen, nonetheless it highlights the importance of good financing practices and the requirement to maintain financial institutions accountable for just about any discrimination they engage in. While the lawsuit progresses, it is going to be carefully watched by advocates for fair lending techniques, minority-owned organizations, and the others worried about ensuring similar use of credit and economic opportunity.
You need to be a member of On Feet Nation to add comments!
Join On Feet Nation